Obzor is truly unique...it looks fast, almost like it
                  came from a science fiction movie. Despite it's high
                  tech appearance Obzor is very simple to use and
                  presents an easy to acquire reticule that is useful in
                  CQB and effective for more precise shooting at longer
                  ranges. Obzor sits higher than many Russian optics and
                  again I believe this is probably due to it's intended
                  role as a fast acquisition collimator for close combat
                  (and probably due to ballistic helmets with visors
                  like K6-3 Atlyn)(And as of 2020
                  I'm convinced it's for use with NV optics as well)
                
                
Obzor is the descendant of NIT-A
                  and appears to use the same or very similar light
                  sensing technology originally fielded in NIT-A. The
                  light sensors are designed to create an always on
                  reticule that needs no batteries, but is not etched in
                  the glass like other collimator type optics. For low
                  light shooting it uses a tritium lit reticule
                    pattern. 
                
              
While many Russian optics can be considered 'out
                  there' in comparison with more traditional Western
                  optics, I think it's safe to say that other than NIT-A
                  there is really nothing comparable to Obzor on the
                  market, other than the relatively new Trijicon RMR 08.
                  
                
                  **Update 2020: After getting into high end Western
                  night vision I have discovered something really
                  interesting about Obzor. It's the perfect height for
                  NV use and there is no discernible loss of light
                  coming through the objective when using Gen 3 NV
                  devices. The tritium doesn't overpower the NODs and to
                  my surprise the day light reticule on mine actually
                  appears somewhat dimly, at least under decent star
                  light. The purple coating that annoys some people in
                  daylight actually has no effect on light transmission
                  through nods, which is remarkable to me. I could take
                  200 yard shots if I needed to just like with most high
                  end Western red dots, illumination conditions
                  permitting of course
                
                  This has now become my solid favorite of all combloc
                  collimators and red dots, by a significant margin**
                
                
It's Obzorius
              
                
Suppressed Obzoriusness (with Dead Air PBS-1
                  Wolverine) and AkFiles BadElement 20 round true black
                  mag
                
Caution: This is NOT hearing safe. Use
                  earpro
              
Obzor on the AK105 with Surefire SOCOM 762 RC
                  suppressor
                
                          
                  
              
                          Obzor has
                  undergone at least one evolution before it's present
                  appearance and is actually a re-design...originally
                  called SOLO II but now labelled 1P63, from  NPZ's
                        website. According to Tantal the version we
                      see in the States may also have kept the 1P63 GRAU
                      index number as an upgraded SOLO optic. Since SOLO
                      was certified by NPZ for military service NPZ may
                      have been able to evolve the design into the
                      current Obzor without having to re-certify. 
                    
 
                    
                    What we call Obzor is also called PK1
                  for export
                    
 
NPZ PK1 marked Obzor on left, and Obzor marked on right. These are identical as far as I can see except for the logo area where Obzor has a plate and PK1 does not. Otherwise I cannot tell a difference
And acquired March 2017 1P63 marked Obzor complete with Hammer and Sickle
From the recent 2014 Ukrainian conflict, Obzor
                  with Russian VDV forces
                
                    
 
                
                From theakforum.net, member Voron doing some
                  field testing in the rain 
(Review by Voron here)
                  
                  Voron's targets. In this photo the contrast filter is
                  not on but if the reticule were to wash out against a
                  lighter background a simple flip of the switch will
                  bring the contrast back. 
                

With contrast filter ON
It should be noted that Obzor was not mounted to a rifle during these photos
Obzor's tritium reticule for low light / night shooting. The T pattern fits in the space between the triangle and 3 bars that you see in the daylight reticule pictures above.
Light sensors and controls
Obzor also uses the 'universal' version of the SVD clamp, you can see the lever is reversed compared to the PSO-1 style clamp. Note the top light sensor
Bottom sensor
Windage and elevation are on the rear of the optic. Remove the caps and use a screw driver to turn reticule to point of impact at 100 meters. You can also dial in the 400m AK74 zero as well
Trajectory (Bullet point of impact):
B = Down
H = Up
Л = Right
П = Left
Obzor does not have an on/off lever like the NIT-A but it does have the same filter/darken lever to increase contrast with the reticule
Since Obzor is not caliber specific it is right at home on any AK pattern rifle including the AK103
Comparison to the Trijicon RMR 08
I recently bought an RMR with the green triangle and am certainly impressed by the size and weight, but in quick comparisons against Obzor it is very clear Obzor is a more effective design.
The RMR has very poor performance when shooting from low light into bright light...the triangle does not get bright enough and it easily washes out against almost any lighter background. It also is hard to acquire against darker backgrounds. In my garage during daylight I could barely see the triangle when sighting through the windows down into the street. The garage was well lit but the fiber on the RMR needs a LOT of light to make the triangle bright. Obzor on the other hand is much more light sensitive and the triangle is much easier to see. Obzor has the same root issue shooting from low light into bright but handles it much much better than the RMR. Other reviewers have said the same thing about the RMR, that it's very difficult when shooting from indoors to outdoors, so while it is an attractive package due to size and weight it really does not compare well at all to the larger and heavier Obzor
From the recent 2014 conflict in the Ukraine. These are Russian troops with Obzor in the field.

I am a big fan of Rakurs for many reasons and used to recommend it as my primary favorite, but Obzor has really impressed me and has become my favorite collimator by a wide margin. I still recommend Rakurs for people new to Russian optics but Obzor is definitely worth considering at some point. With a little practice and familiarity I am finding it to be highly effective.









































